The shock generator had switches labeled with different voltages, starting at 30 volts and increasing in 15-volt increments all the way up to 450 volts.
The shock generator had switches labeled with different voltages, starting at 30 volts and increasing in 15-volt increments all the way up to 450 volts.The switches were also labeled with terms which reminded the participant of how dangerous the shocks were.Tags: Technology Research PapersMake Abstract Research PapersBusiness Continuity Plan Example DocumentTyger William Blake Essays1990 Ap Biology EssayIgnite Business PlanGraphic Organizer For Argumentative Essay
Talk to your advisor if you have material that you are not certain about.
They should be able to provide guidance about what should be included in an Appendix.
Procedures The participant met another "participant" in the waiting room before the experiment. Each participant got the role as a "teacher" who would then deliver a shock to the actor ("learner") every time an incorrect answer to a question was produced.
The participant believed that he was delivering real shocks to the learner. As the experiment progressed, the teacher would hear the learner plead to be released and complain about a heart condition.
The expectation is that very few will keep giving shocks, and that most participants will disobey the order. They were recruited by advertisement in a newspaper and were paid $4.50.
Instruments A "shock generator" was used to trick the participants into thinking that they were giving an electric shock to another person in another room.There are few facts about the role of obedience when committing acts against one’s personal conscience (1961).Most theories suggest that only very disturbed people are capable of administering pain to an ordinary citizen if they are ordered to do so.Our experiment tested people's obedience to authority.The results showed that most obey all orders given by the authority-figure, despite their unwillingness.All 40 participants continued to give shocks up to 300 volts.Most of the participants became very agitated, stressed and angry at the experimenter.The experimenter then instructed the participant to treat this silence as an incorrect response and deliver a further shock.When asking the experimenter if they should stop, they were instructed to continue.Page 3-: Introduction Current theories about the topic. Citing those will give you more credibility because good research is thought to be based on other knowledge and empirical (observed) evidence.Tables, Figures, Appendix The text in this article is licensed under the Creative Commons-License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).